4.7 Article

The Degree of Nesting between Spindles and Slow Oscillations Modulates Neural Synchrony

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 40, 期 24, 页码 4673-4684

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2682-19.2020

关键词

correlation; sleep; spiking; spindle; slow waves; slow oscillations

资金

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Rehabilitation Research and Development Service Award [1I01RX001640-01A1]
  2. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke of the National Institutes of Health Award [K02NS093014]
  3. National Institutes of Health BRAIN Initiative Award [NS094375]
  4. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship
  5. American Heart Association Predoctoral Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spindles and slow oscillations (SOs) both appear to play an important role in memory consolidation. Spindle and SO nesting, or the temporal overlap between the two events, is believed to modulate consolidation. However, the neurophysiological processes modified by nesting remain poorly understood. We thus recorded activity from the primary motor cortex of 4 male sleeping rats to investigate how SO and spindles interact to modulate the correlation structure of neural firing. During spindles, primary motor cortex neurons fired at a preferred phase, with neural pairs demonstrating greater neural synchrony, or correlated firing, during spindle peaks. We found a direct relationship between the temporal proximity between SO and spindles, and changes to the distribution of neural correlations; nesting was associated with narrowing of the distribution, with a reduction in low- and high-correlation pairs. Such narrowing may be consistent with greater exploration of neural states. Interestingly, after animals practiced a novel motor task, pairwise correlations increased during nested spindles, consistent with targeted strengthening of functional interactions. These findings may be key mechanisms through which spindle nesting supports memory consolidation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据