3.8 Article

MTHFD1 formyltetrahydrofolate synthetase deficiency, a model for the MTHFD1 R653Q variant, leads to congenital heart defects in mice

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bdra.23451

关键词

MTHFD1; 10-formyltetrahydrofolate synthetase; folic acid; congenital heart defects; ventricular septal defect; rs2236225; one-carbon folate metabolism

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundA single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the synthetase domain of the trifunctional folate-dependent enzyme MTHFD1 (c.1958G>A, R653Q) has been linked to adverse pregnancy outcomes, neural tube defects, and possibly congenital heart defects. Maternal folate deficiency may also modify the risk associated with these disorders. We recently established a mouse model with a mild deficiency of 10-formyltetrahydrofolate synthetase activity in MTHFD1 (Mthfd1S(+/-) mice) to investigate disorders associated with SNPs in this gene. The effect of synthetase deficiency on embryonic heart development has not yet been examined. MethodsFemale Mthfd1S(+/+) and (+/-) mice were placed on control and folate-deficient diets for 6 weeks before mating to Mthfd1S(+/-) males. Embryos and placentae were collected at embryonic day 14.5. Embryos were evaluated for congenital heart defects by histological examination. ResultsEmbryonic Mthfd1S(+/-) genotype was associated with an increased incidence of heart defects, primarily ventricular septal defects. Other markers of embryonic development (crown-rump length, embryonic weight, embryonic delay, placental weight, and thickness of the ventricular myocardium) were not affected by embryonic genotype. Maternal genotype and diet did not have a significant effect on these outcomes. ConclusionDeficiency of the MTHFD1 10-formyltetrahydrofolate synthetase activity in embryos is associated with increased incidence of congenital heart defects. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 103:1031-1038, 2015. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据