4.7 Article

Targeting ALK2: An Open Science Approach to Developing Therapeutics for the Treatment of Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 63, 期 9, 页码 4978-4996

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00395

关键词

-

资金

  1. Cancer Therapeutics Innovation Pipeline program at the Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (OICR)
  2. Government of Ontario
  3. Brain Tumour Charity
  4. AbbVie
  5. Bayer Pharma AG
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim
  7. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  8. Eshelman Institute for Innovation
  9. Genome Canada through Ontario Genomics Institute [OGI-055]
  10. Innovative Medicines Initiative (EU/EFPIA) [ULTRA-DD] [115766]
  11. Janssen
  12. Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
  13. MSD
  14. Novartis Pharma AG
  15. Pfizer
  16. Sao Paulo Research Foundation-FAPESP
  17. Takeda
  18. Wellcome [106169/ZZ14/Z]
  19. NSERC [432008-2013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma is an aggressive pediatric cancer for which no effective chemotherapeutic drugs exist. Analysis of the genomic landscape of this disease has led to the identification of the serine/threonine kinase ALK2 as a potential target for therapeutic intervention. In this work, we adopted an open science approach to develop a series of potent type I inhibitors of ALK2 which are orally bio-available and brain-penetrant. Initial efforts resulted in the discovery of M4K2009, an analogue of the previously reported ALK2 inhibitor LDN-214117. Although highly selective for ALK2 over the TGF-beta R1 receptor ALK5, M4K2009 is also moderately active against the hERG potassium channel. Varying the substituents of the trimethoxyphenyl moiety gave rise to an equipotent benzamide analogue M4K2149 with reduced off-target affinity for the ion channel. Additional modifications yielded 2-fluoro-6-methoxybenzamide derivatives (26a-c), which possess high inhibitory activity against ALK2, excellent selectivity, and superior pharmacokinetic profiles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据