4.6 Article

Interpretation of the photoluminescence decay kinetics in metal halide perovskite nanocrystals and thin polycrystalline films

期刊

JOURNAL OF LUMINESCENCE
卷 221, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2020.117092

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) [TEC2017-86102-C2-1-R]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) [724424]
  3. Generalitat Valenciana via Prometeo [Prometeo/2018/098]
  4. Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan [AP05130083]
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [724424] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper we present critical analysis of different points of view on interpretation of the photoluminescence (PL) decay kinetics in lead halide perovskites prepared in the form of well passivated nanocrystals (PNCs) or thin polycrystalline layers. In addition to the literature data, our own measurements are also considered. For PNCs, a strong dependence of the PL lifetimes on the type of passivating ligand was observed with a consistently high PL quantum yield. It is shown that such ligand effects, as well as a decrease in the PL lifetime with decreasing temperature, are well qualitatively explained by the phenomenological model of thermally activated delayed luminescence, in which the extension of the PL decay time with temperature occurs due to the participation of shallow non-quenching traps. In the case of thin perovskite layers, we conclude that the PL kinetics under sufficiently low excitation intensity is determined by the excitation quenching on the layer surfaces. We demonstrate that a large variety of possible PL decay kinetics for thin polycrystalline perovskite films can be modelled by means of one-dimensional diffusion equation with use of the diffusion coefficient D and surface recombination velocity S as parameters and conclude that long-lived PL kinetics are formed in case of low D and/or S values.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据