4.3 Article

Effect of sitagliptin on expression of skeletal muscle peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator-1α and irisin in a rat model of type 2 diabetes mellitus

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0300060519885569

关键词

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator-1 alpha; irisin; diabetes mellitus type 2; sitagliptin; phosphoadenylated adenylate activated protein kinase; insulin resistance; glycoplipid metabolism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To evaluate the effect of sitagliptin on skeletal muscle expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator-1 alpha (PGC-1 alpha), irisin, and phosphoadenylated adenylate activated protein kinase (p-AMPK) in a rat model of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods A high-fat diet/streptozotocin T2DM rat model was established. Rats were divided into T2DM, low-dose sitagliptin (ST1), high-dose sitagliptin (ST2), and normal control groups (NC). PGC-1 alpha, irisin, and p-AMPK protein levels in skeletal muscle were measured by western blot, and PCG-1 alpha and Fndc5 mRNA levels were assessed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Results Fasting plasma glucose (FPG), fasting insulin (FIns), homeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) were significantly up-regulated in the T2DM compared with the other groups, and FPG, FIns, total cholesterol, triglycerides, TNF-alpha, and HOMA-IR were significantly down-regulated in the ST2 compared with the ST1 group. PGC-1 alpha, irisin, and p-AMPK expression levels decreased successively in the ST2, ST1, and DM groups compared with the NC, and were all significantly up-regulated in the ST2 compared with the ST1 group. Conclusion Down-regulation of PGC-1 alpha and irisin in skeletal muscle may be involved in T2DM. Sitagliptin can dose-dependently up-regulate PCG-1 alpha and irisin, potentially improving insulin resistance and glycolipid metabolism and inhibiting inflammation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据