4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

MCP-PMT development at Argonne for particle identification

期刊

JOURNAL OF INSTRUMENTATION
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/15/04/C04038

关键词

Photon detectors for UV; visible and IR photons (vacuum); Photon detectors for UV; visible and IR photons (vacuum) (photomultipliers, HPDs, others)

资金

  1. Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) funding from Argonne National Laboratory by the Office of Science, of the U.S. Department of Energy [DEAC02-06CH11357]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics, Office of High Energy Physics [DE-AC0206CH11357]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science [DE-SC0012704]
  4. EIC R&D from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics [DE-SC0012704]
  5. DOE Office of Science [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The proposed high-energy high-luminosity polarized Electron-Ion Collider (EIC) demands excellent particle identification over a wide range of particles momenta to achieve the best separation between signal and background particles. Various Cherenkov imaging detector sub-systems are being considered in EIC detector concepts for hadron identification for particles momenta up to 50 GeV/c. One important challenge in this case is to provide a reliable highly pixelated photosensor working in the high radiation and high magnetic field environment. The recently commercialized Large Area Picosecond Photo-Detector (LAPPD) provides a promising low-cost photosensor solution for the various EIC Cherenkov imaging sub-systems. Optimization of the phtosensor design for high magnetic field tolerance, precision timing resolution, and pixelated readout was performed at Argonne National Laboratory with 6 x 6 cm(2) microchannel plate photomultipliers. The techniques and optimized design parameters would be transferrable to industrial partners for low-cost LAPPD production to achieve the demonstrated performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据