4.7 Review

Airborne or Droplet Precautions for Health Workers Treating Coronavirus Disease 2019?

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 225, 期 9, 页码 1561-1568

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa189

关键词

airborne transmission; COVID-19; droplet precautions; mask; respiratory protection

资金

  1. NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence [APP1107393]
  2. Integrated Systems for Epidemic Response
  3. NHMRC Principal Research Fellowship [1137582]
  4. Smith Family Foundation
  5. MIT Policy Lab

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cases of COVID-19 have been reported worldwide, with a high number of healthcare workers being infected. There are conflicting guidelines for COVID-19 prevention, and the available evidence does not support droplet precautions and a 1- to 2-meter spatial separation rule.
Cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been reported in more than 200 countries. Thousands of health workers have been infected, and outbreaks have occurred in hospitals, aged care facilities, and prisons. The World Health Organization (WHO) has issued guidelines for contact and droplet precautions for healthcare workers caring for suspected COVID-19 patients, whereas the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has initially recommended airborne precautions. The 1- to 2-meter (approximate to 3-6 feet) rule of spatial separation is central to droplet precautions and assumes that large droplets do not travel further than 2 meters (approximate to 6 feet). We aimed to review the evidence for horizontal distance traveled by droplets and the guidelines issued by the WHO, CDC, and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control on respiratory protection for COVID-19. We found that the evidence base for current guidelines is sparse, and the available data do not support the 1- to 2-meter (approximate to 3-6 feet) rule of spatial separation. Of 10 studies on horizontal droplet distance, 8 showed droplets travel more than 2 meters (approximate to 6 feet), in some cases up to 8 meters (approximate to 26 feet). Several studies of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) support aerosol transmission, and 1 study documented virus at a distance of 4 meters (approximate to 13 feet) from the patient. Moreover, evidence suggests that infections cannot neatly be separated into the dichotomy of droplet versus airborne transmission routes. Available studies also show that SARS-CoV-2 can be detected in the air, and remain viable 3 hours after aerosolization. The weight of combined evidence supports airborne precautions for the occupational health and safety of health workers treating patients with COVID-19. At present, the limited available evidence does not support droplet precautions and 1- to 2-meter (approximate to 3-6 feet) rule of special separation being adequate for occupational health and safety of health workers treating patients with COVID-19.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据