4.7 Article

Impaired Cellular Immune Responses During the First Week of Severe Acute Influenza Infection

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 222, 期 7, 页码 1235-1244

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa226

关键词

Influenza; cellular immunity; illness severity; CD8+T cell; B cell; monocyte

资金

  1. Emergency Medicine Foundation
  2. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health [UL1TR002345]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Cellular immune responses are not well characterized during the initial days of acute symptomatic influenza infection. Methods. We developed a prospective cohort of human subjects with confirmed influenza illness of varying severity who presented within a week after symptom onset. We characterized lymphocyte and monocyte populations as well as antigen-specific CD8(+) T-cell and B-cell responses from peripheral blood mononuclear cells using flow cytometry and enzyme-linked immunospot assays. Results. We recruited 68 influenza-infected individuals on average 3.5 days after the onset of symptoms. Three patients required mechanical ventilation. Influenza-specific CD8(+) T-cell responses expanded before the appearance of plasmablast B cells. However, the influenza-specific CD8(+) T-cell response was lower in infected subjects than responses seen in uninfected control subjects. Circulating populations of inflammatory monocytes were increased in most subjects compared with healthy controls. Inflammatory monocytes were significantly reduced in the 3 subjects requiring mechanical ventilation. Inflammatory monocytes were also reduced in a separate validation cohort of mechanically ventilated patients. Conclusions. Antigen-specific CD8(+) T cells respond early during acute influenza infection at magnitudes that are lower than responses seen in uninfected individuals. Circulating inflammatory monocytes increase during acute illness and low absolute numbers are associated with very severe disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据