4.7 Article

Renewable malic acid-based plasticizers for both PVC and PLA polymers

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2020.04.007

关键词

Malic acid alkyl esters; Plasticizers; Renewable resources; Poly(vinyl chloride); Poly(lactic acid)

资金

  1. Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology (KRICT) [SI2011-20]
  2. Technology Development Program to Solve Climate Change of the National Research Foundation (NRF) - Ministry of Science and ICT of the Republic of Korea [NRF-2017M1A2A2049103]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acetylated malic acid alkyl esters (AcMAE-Cn) with different alkyl chain lengths, as alternative plasticizers for both poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) and poly(lactic acid) (PLA), were synthesized by the esterification of renewable malic acid with alcohols and subsequent acetylation. The molecular structure of the synthesized plasticizers was confirmed using H-1 NMR and FT-IR spectroscopy. PVC or PLA blends containing 50 phr of the plasticizers were evaluated by dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), tensile testing, and migration testing to evaluate the plasticization efficiency. The plasticized PVC films presented good plasticizing performance, as demonstrated by the results of tensile and migration testing and the T-g values (as determined by DMA). Among the plasticizers, AcMAE-C6 and AcMAE-C8 presented enhanced plasticizing performance compared with that of the commercial dioctyl adipate (DOA) and di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) plasticizers. Additionally, the plasticizing properties of the plasticized PLA films depend significantly on the structure of the plasticizers. It was found that plasticizers (AcMAE-C4 and AcMAE-C6) bearing short alkyl groups (n-butyl and n-hexyl, respectively) may act as excellent plasticizers. In summary, the AcMAE-C6 plasticizer showed potential as an alternative plasticizer for both PVC and PLA polymers. (C) 2020 The Korean Society of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据