4.7 Article

Salicylic acid-induced nitric oxide enhances arsenic toxicity tolerance in maize plants by upregulating the ascorbate-glutathione cycle and glyoxalase system

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 399, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123020

关键词

Salicylic acid; Arsenic stress tolerance; Oxidative stress; Nitric oxide; Maize antioxidant enzymes

资金

  1. University of Harran (Turkey)
  2. European Regional Development Fund from the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [AGL2015-65104-P]
  3. King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia [RSP-2019/116]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The role of nitric oxide (NO) in salicylic acid (SA)-induced tolerance to arsenic (As) stress in maize plants is not reported in the literature. Before starting As stress (AsS) treatments, SA (0.5 mM) was sprayed to the foliage of maize plants. Thereafter, AsV (0.1 mM as sodium hydrogen arsenate heptahydrate) stress (AsS) was initiated and during the stress period, sodium nitroprusside (SNP 0.1 mM), a NO donor, was sprayed individually or in combination with SA. Furthermore, cPTIO (0.1 mM) was also applied as a NO scavenger during the stress period. Arsenic stress led to significant reductions in plant growth, photosynthesis, water relation parameters and endogenous NO content, but it increased hydrogen peroxide, malondialdehyde, electrolyte leakage, methylglyoxal, proline, the activities of major antioxidant enzymes, and leaf and root As content. The combined treatment of SA + SNP was more effective to reverse oxidative stress related parameters and reduce the As content in both leaves and roots, with a concomitant increase in antioxidant defense system, the ascorbate-glutathione (AsAGSH) cycle-related enzymes, glyoxalase system enzymes, plant growth, and photosynthetic traits. The beneficial effects of SA were completely abolished with cPTIO supply by blocking the NO synthesis in AsS-maize plants, indicating that NO effectively participated in SA-improved tolerance to AsS in maize plants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据