4.7 Article

A novel tubular up-flow magnetic film photocatalytic system optimized by main factors control for efficient removal of chlorophenols wastewater

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 398, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122963

关键词

Magnetic catalyst; Multistage series system; Photocatalysis reactor; Refractory organics; Wastewater treatment

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51308179]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province [E2016201179, B2019201043]
  3. Hebei Education Department [QN20131016]
  4. Science and Technology Support Program of Baoding city [12ZF087, 18ZF314]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chlorophenols (CPs) are still used as raw material or intermediate in some industries. Photocatalytic oxidation is free from secondary pollution, but the efficiency is restricted by some main factors. In this study, a novel high efficiency tubular up-flow magnetic film (TUMF) photocatalytic system was investigated based on the magnetic lanthanum doping core-shell Fe3O4@SiO2@TiO2 (La-FST) nanoparticles. When the dosage of La-FST was 0.4 g/ L, the flow velocity was 94.2 mL/min, and the circulated irradiation of 15 W maintained 40 min, the average removal rate of 2,4-dichlorophenol (2,4-DCP) was reduced significantly from 10 mg/L to 0.0803 mg/L by TUMF system, meeting the limits of the particular items (0.093 mg/L) from national environmental quality standards for surface water, avoiding the problem of photocatalyst separation and loss. The photoinduced holes (h(+)) was the key active radical to oxidize 2,4-DCP, and the main factors of TUMF system could be well controlled to achieve satisfactory effluent quality. A prediction method of photocatalytic reaction time in a multistage series TUMF system was established to remove 2,4-DCP from 100 mg/L to 0.5 mg/L, saving 86 min. The novel high efficiency TUMF system provides a technical selection for the photocatalytic degradation of CPs and other refractory organics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据