4.7 Article

Impact of biochar amendment on the uptake, fate and bioavailability of pharmaceuticals in soil-radish systems

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 398, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122852

关键词

Pharmaceuticals; Plant uptake; Biochar; Bioavailability; Soil pore water

资金

  1. Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grant [2016-67017-24514, 2017-67017-26168]
  2. Hatch Act Formula Grant from USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [1012794, 1021038]
  3. Michigan AgBioResearch Project GREEEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Crops grown in soils receiving wastewaters, biosolids, or manures can accumulate pharmaceuticals in edible parts, raising concerns over potential human exposure to multiple pharmaceuticals. Nonetheless, viable mitigation options for minimizing plant uptake of pharmaceuticals are limited. This study evaluated how biochar amendment could influence the uptake of 15 pharmaceuticals by radish (Raphanus sativus) grown in a sandy loam at two amendment rates (0.1 and 1% w/w). Comparing with that in the unamended soil, the accumulation of acetaminophen, carbamazepine, sulfadiazine, sulfamethoxazole, lamotrigine, carbadox, trimethoprim, oxytetracycline, tylosin, estrone, and triclosan in radish grown in the soil amended with 1.0% of biochar was significantly decreased by 33.3-83.0%. However, the concentration of lincomycin in radish was increased by 36.7-48.2% in the soil amended with 1% biochar. While the soil amended with 1.0% of biochar had increased sorption of all 15 pharmaceuticals, the persistence of 7 pharmaceuticals in the soil were prolonged, including caffeine, sulfadiazine, sulfamethoxazole, lincomycin, estrone, 17 beta-estradiol and triclosan. The reduced plant uptake of pharmaceuticals was mainly due to their lowered concentrations in pore water by the presence of biochar. Overall, the estimated daily intake data suggest that biochar amendment could potentially decrease total human exposure to a mixture of pharmaceuticals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据