4.5 Article

Hypoxia-responsive miR-141-3p is involved in the progression of breast cancer via mediating the HMGB1/HIF-1 alpha signaling pathway

期刊

JOURNAL OF GENE MEDICINE
卷 22, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jgm.3230

关键词

breast cancer; HIF-1 alpha; HMGB1; hypoxia; miR-141-3p

资金

  1. Special funds for post-doctoral innovation project in shandong province of China
  2. Medical and health science and technology development project of Shandong province [2017ws508]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Hypoxia-responsive miRs have been frequently reported in the growth of various malignant tumors. The present study aimed to investigate whether hypoxia-responsive miR-141-3p was implicated in the pathogenesis of breast cancer via mediating the high-mobility group box protein 1 (HMGB1)/hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1 alpha signaling pathway. Materials and methods miRs expression profiling was filtrated by miR microarray assays. Gene and protein expression levels, respectively, were examined by a quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chaion reaction and western blotting. Cell migration and invasion were analyzed using a transwell assay. Cell growth was determined using nude-mouse transplanted tumor experiments. Results miR-141-3p was observed as a hypoxia-responsive miR in breast cancer. miR-141-3p was down-regulated in breast cancer specimens and could serve as an independent prognostic factor for predicting overall survival in breast cancer patients. In addition, the overexpression of miR-141-3p could inhibit hypoxia-induced cell migration and impede human breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cell growthin vivo.Mechanistically, the hypoxia-related HMGB1/HIF-1 alpha signaling pathway might be a possible target of miR-141-3p with respect to preventing the development of breast cancer. Conclusions Our finding provides a new mechanism by which miR-141-3p could prevent hypoxia-induced breast tumorigenesis via post-transcriptional repression of the HMGB1/HIF-1 alpha signaling pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据