4.5 Article

Ultrasound processing of verjuice (unripe grape juice) vinegar: effect on bioactive compounds, sensory properties, microbiological quality and anticarcinogenic activity

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-MYSORE
卷 57, 期 9, 页码 3445-3456

出版社

SPRINGER INDIA
DOI: 10.1007/s13197-020-04379-5

关键词

Ultrasound; Verjuice vinegar; Response surface methodology; Genetic algorithm; Anticarcinogenic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Verjuice is one of the alternative fruit juices recently obtained from unripe grapes. In this study, the aim was primarily to optimize the process conditions for the enrichment of bioactive components in verjuice vinegar with ultrasound treatment. For this purpose, ultrasound treatment was applied to vinegar samples at different times (2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 min), different amplitudes (60%, 65%, 70%, 75% and 80%) and 26 kHz frequency. Total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), total antioxidant capacity (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC) were evaluated for optimization (response surface methodology (RSM) and genetic algorithm (GA)) of process conditions. The sensory properties, microbiological quality and anticarcinogenic activity were then evaluated for the ultrasound-treated verjuice vinegar (UVV) (9.4 min and 68.7 amplitude result of RSM), traditional verjuice vinegar and pasteurized verjuice vinegar samples obtained from the optimization. At the end of the RSM optimization, CUPRAC (464.44 mg TEAC/mL), DPPH (0.694 mg TEAC/mL), TFC (70.85 mg CE/mL) and TPC (12.22 mg GAE/mL) were determined. RSM and GA results were found to be approximately the same. Analysis results showed that ultrasound-treated verjuice vinegar was enriched bioactive components compared to other samples. Verjuice vinegar showed anticarcinogenic effects. The UVV sample was generally appreciated in sensory evaluation. As a result, ultrasound treatment of verjuice vinegar was found to be successful.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据