4.7 Article

A glutathione-dependent control of the indole butyric acid pathway supports Arabidopsis root system adaptation to phosphate deprivation

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
卷 71, 期 16, 页码 4843-4857

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eraa195

关键词

Arabidopsis; auxins; glutathione; indole butyric acid; lateral roots; phosphate; root hair; root system

资金

  1. Agropolis Fundation (Flagship project CalClim)
  2. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  3. Universite de Perpignan Via Domitia
  4. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACYT) [254639/411761]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Root system architecture results from a highly plastic developmental process to adapt to environmental conditions. In particular, the development of lateral roots and root hair growth are constantly optimized to the rhizosphere properties, including biotic and abiotic constraints. The development of the root system is tightly controlled by auxin, the driving morphogenic hormone in plants. Glutathione, a major thiol redox regulator, is also critical for root development but its interplay with auxin is scarcely understood. Previous work showed that glutathione deficiency does not alter root responses to indole acetic acid (IAA), the main active auxin in plants. Because indole butyric acid (IBA), another endogenous auxinic compound, is an important source of IAA for the control of root development, we investigated the crosstalk between glutathione and IBA during root development. We show that glutathione deficiency alters lateral roots and root hair responses to exogenous IBA but not IAA. Detailed genetic analyses suggest that glutathione regulates IBA homeostasis or conversion to IAA in the root cap. Finally, we show that both glutathione and IBA are required to trigger the root hair response to phosphate deprivation, suggesting an important role for this glutathione-dependent regulation of the auxin pathway in plant developmental adaptation to its environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据