4.4 Article

Association Between Okinawan Vegetables Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in Japanese Communities: The JPHC Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 30, 期 5, 页码 227-235

出版社

JAPAN EPIDEMIOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.2188/jea.JE20180262

关键词

cohort study; Okinawan vegetable; type 2 diabetes

资金

  1. National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund
  2. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan
  3. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries [MAFF-CPS-2016-1-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Some Okinawan vegetables have been reported to have anti-diabetic activity; however, no prospective cohort study has clarified whether consumption of Okinawan vegetables is associated with a risk of type 2 diabetes. This study aimed to determine the association between consumption of Okinawan vegetables and risk of type 2 diabetes through a large-scale. population-based, prospective study in Japan. Methods: We examined 10,732 participants (4,714 men and 6,018 women) aged 45-74 years who resided in Okinawa. Participants were asked to answer a 147-item food frequency questionnaire. We calculated the overall amount of Okinawan vegetables consumed and the amount of seven specific kinds of Okinawan vegetables consumed. The odds ratios (ORs) for self-reported type 2 diabetes during 5 years of follow-up were estimated via multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: During the 5-year period, 216 new cases (123 men and 93 women) of type 2 diabetes were reported. Comparing the highest tertile to the lowest tertile of intake, the overall amount of Okinawan vegetables consumed was not associated with risk of type 2 diabetes in men (OR 1.22; 95% confidence interval [IC], 0.74--2.01, P-trend = 0.53) or in women (OR 0.96; 95% CI, 0.57-1.62, P-trend = 0.89). The consumption of seven specific kinds of Okinawan vegetables was also not associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes. Conclusions: The consumption of total Okinawan vegetables was not associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据