4.2 Article

Ion-exchange polymers modified bacterial cellulose electrodes for the selective removal of nitrite ions from tail water of dyeing wastewater

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
卷 91, 期 -, 页码 62-72

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2020.01.002

关键词

Bacterial cellulose; Capacitive deionization; Ionic polymer; Nitrite; Selective removal

资金

  1. Special Applied Technology Research and Development of Guangdong Province (major project) [2015B020235013]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21577027]
  3. 2017 Central Special Fund for Soil, Preliminary Study on Harmless Treatment and Comprehensive Utilization of Tailings in Dabao Mountain [18HK0108]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ion-exchange polymer and modified carbonization bacterial cellulose (CBC) electrodes were fabricated using varying amounts of cation-exchange polymers (glutaric acid (GA) and sulfosuccinic acid (SSA)) and assembled within an asymmetric capacitive deionization unit (p-CDI). The performance of selective NO2- electro-adsorption was studied. The AC/CBCSSA group showed a better salt adsorption capacity (14.56 mg/g) and nitrite removal efficiency (71.01%) than the AC/CBC-GA (10.72 mg/g, 47.83%) and AC/AC (4.81 mg/g, 12.74%) groups. It was confirmed that the CBC-SSA/GA electrodes enhanced nitrite selectivity and increased the adsorption capacity, and the total amounts of adsorbed anions increased when the applied voltage was increased from 0.8 to 1.2 V, while the molar fraction of nitrate decreased. The competitive and preferential adsorption of anions was further investigated using different binary solutions of anions and occurred in the following sequence: NO2- > SO2- 4 > NO3- > F- approximate to Cl-. Furthermore, the p-CDI units were applied to remove nitrite in real wastewater samples, and the results showed that they had excellent reusability and application for use in dyeing wastewater treatment. (C) 2020 The Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据