4.7 Article

Reducing greenhouse gas emissions and enhancing carbon and nitrogen conversion in food wastes by the black soldier fly

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 260, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110066

关键词

Black soldier fly; Greenhouse gas; pH values; Food waste; Carbon and nitrogen conversion

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFD0500203]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2662017JC045, 2662017JCO26]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Currently, sustainable utilisation, including recycling and valorisation, is becoming increasingly relevant in environmental management. The wastes bioconversion by the black soldier fly larva (BSFL) has two potential advantages: the larvae can convert the carbon and nitrogen in the biomass waste, and improve the properties of the substrate to reduce the loss of gaseous carbon and nitrogen. In the present study, the conversion rate of carbon, nitrogen and the emissions of greenhouse gases and NH3 during BSFL bio-treatment of food waste were investigated under different pH conditions. The results showed that the pH of the raw materials is a pivotal parameter affecting the process. The average wet weight of harvested BSFL was 13.26-95.28 mg/larva, with about 1.95-13.41% and 5.40-18.93% of recycled carbon and nitrogen from substrate at a pH from 3.0 to 11.0, respectively. Furthermore, pH is adversely correlated with CO2 emissions, but positively with NH3 emissions. Cumulative CO2, NH3, CH4 and N2O emissions at pH ranging from 3.0 to 11.0 were 88.15-161.11 g kg(-1), 0.15-1.68 g kg(-1), 0.19-2.62 mg kg(-1) and 0.02-1.65 mg kg(-1), respectively. Compared with the values in open composting, BSFL bio-treatment of food waste could lead greenhouse gas (especially CH4 and N2O) and NH, emissions to decrease. Therefore, a higher pH value of the substrate can increase the larval output and help the mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据