4.7 Article

Effect of composition of Pd10-xCux (x=2, 3, 4, and 5) alloy nanoparticles on their electrocatalysis for methanol oxidation

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114144

关键词

Pd10-xCux alloy catalysts; Methanol oxidation; Controllable composition; Phase state

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2016R1A2B4014012]
  2. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE), Korea [P0000273]
  3. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [P0000273] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is well accepted that the structure, composition, and properties of solid materials are closely related with one another. In this regard, studying the relationship between the composition/structure and electrocatalytic properties can provide a great deal of insights to the design of new catalyst with enhanced electrochemical properties. In this work, Pd10-xCux nanoparticle (NP) catalysts with different Pd/Cu ratios (x = 2, 3, 4, and 5) were prepared and compared for their electrocatalytic properties for methanol oxidation reaction (MOR). Sonochemical reactions in ethylene glycol of metal precursors produced these NPs withmost of the features other than the composition the same with one another. Based on the characterization data by XRD, TEMand othermethods, x = 2 sample has the face-centered cubic (FCC) structure, x = 5 sample the body-centered cubic structure, and x = 3 and 4 samples mixtures of the two structures. The catalytic properties data show a volcano-type behavior with the change of composition, peaking at x = 3. The observed trends of electrocatalysis can be explained in terms of the composition and structure. The Pd7Cu3 catalyst shows higher activity than any of related Pd-Cu NP catalysts in the literature. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据