4.3 Article

Effect of brine type and pH on the interfacial tension behavior of carbonated brine/crude oil

期刊

JOURNAL OF DISPERSION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 42, 期 8, 页码 1184-1195

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01932691.2020.1735409

关键词

Crude oil; carbonated brine; IFT; pH; salts

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focuses on the injection of dissolved CO2 in water into oil reservoirs, comparing it with direct injection methods, and investigating the impact of sulfate anions on dynamic interfacial tension changes. The results suggest that temperature and pressure play significant roles in the IFT variation between crude oil and carbonated brine solutions.
Although carbon dioxide (CO2) injection is an efficient tool to enhance the oil recovery, deposition of asphaltenes, extensive gas consumption, rapid breakthrough of CO2, etc. faced it with serious challenges. As a solution for these disadvantages, the injection of dissolved CO2 in water instead of direct CO2 injection is proposed during the past decade. Respect to this fact, in the current investigation, the dynamic interfacial tension (IFT) values of carbonated brines/acidic crude oil are measured to examine synergetic or antagonistic effect of CO2 and aqueous solution consisted of sulfate anions i.e. 15000 ppm of MgSO4 and Na2SO4 in a wide range of temperatures (30-80 degrees C) and pressures (500-4000 psi). The sulfate anion based salts are considered in the current investigation wince it has been well established that sulfate anion can introduce more profound effects on the dynamic IFT variation. Considering the obtained results and comparing them with the previously published studies, one can conclude that the variation of IFT of crude oil/carbonated brine as a function of temperature and pressure is completely different compared to IFT of crude oil/brine due to lower pH resulted regarding the dissolution of CO2 in aqueous phase, dominant effect of CO2 at higher pressures and more diffusivity of CO2 at higher temperatures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据