4.4 Article

Effect of a behavioral-educational sleep intervention for first-time mothers and their infants: pilot of a controlled trial

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SLEEP MEDICINE
卷 16, 期 8, 页码 1265-1274

出版社

AMER ACAD SLEEP MEDICINE
DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.8484

关键词

maternal; infant; behavioral; prenatal; postpartum; sleep intervention; pediatric; actigraphy

资金

  1. Health Research Council of New Zealand [09/255]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study Objectives: This study tested the acceptability and efficacy of a perinatally delivered behavioral-educational sleep intervention. Methods: Participants were 40 primiparous women assigned in late pregnancy to either an intervention (n = 20) or control (n = 20) group. The sleep intervention group (SIG) received prenatal anticipatory education and guidance regarding their own and their infant's sleep during the first 3 months postpartum. This was reinforced during phone calls within the first 6 weeks postpartum. The control group (CG) received brief sleep hygiene information at a prenatal session, followed by 2 phone calls during the same period. Mother-infant pairs wore actigraphs for 48 hours at 6 and 12 weeks postpartum, and mothers kept sleep diaries. Questionnaires completed in late pregnancy and 6 and 12 weeks postpartum related to sleep, newborn care, and mood. The main outcome measures included maternal sleep quantity, efficiency, and self-reported quality and infant sleep duration and consolidation. Results: Mothers reported high acceptability of the study processes. Sleep duration and quality increased for mothers and infants across time in both groups, with a significantly greater increase in nocturnal sleep duration for mothers in the SIG. Conclusions: Prenatal sleep guidance and postnatal follow-up seems to enhance nocturnal sleep of mothers, change their perceptions of their own sleep, and increase confidence in managing their infant's sleep. Follow-up at later intervals and replication with larger, more diverse samples may reveal further differences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据