4.7 Article

The delineation of urban growth boundaries in complex ecological environment areas by using cellular automata and a dual-environmental evaluation

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 256, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120361

关键词

Urban growth boundary; Complex ecological environment; Dual-environmental evaluation; Cellular automata; Future land use simulation model; Ecological protection

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFA0604404]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41671398, 41871318]
  3. Science and Technology Project of Department of Nature Resources of Guangdong Province [GDZRZYKJ2020007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Urban growth boundaries are an efficient tool for protecting non-urban land uses from being dominated by urban sprawl and can promote sustainable urban development. Previous studies have explored the use of a cellular automata simulation and its visualization products in delimiting future UGBs. However, existing CA-UGB delineation models lack a transcendental component for ecological evaluation and are difficult to apply to areas with complex ecological environments or heterogeneous resource endowments. Therefore, this paper introduces an innovative model by coupling the dual-environmental evaluation and the Future Land-use Simulation CA model for delimiting future UGBs. To prioritize ecological protection, some intermediate products of the DEE are processed as pivotal components in the CA simulations. Strict urban simulation constraints are also applied in the FLUS model to meet the DEE regulations and prioritize ecological protection. This model was implemented to plan future UGBs in Chungking, China. After quantifying and comparing the proposed UGB scheme with other UGB delineations of Chungking by using various landscape metrics, the DEE-UGBs show a stronger ability to manage urban patches via aggregation with the simultaneous reconciliation of contradictions among land uses. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据