4.7 Article

A comprehensive investigation on the design and off-design performance of supercritical carbon dioxide power system based on the small-scale lead-cooled fast reactor

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 256, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120720

关键词

Supercritical carbon dioxide; Lead-cooled fast reactor; Design condition determination; Thermal efficiency; Off-design performance

资金

  1. State Key Special Research Project of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2017YFB0603504, 2016YFB0600104]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nuclear energy is a kind of stable, controllable and cleaner energy without massive discharge of pollutant. A comprehensive investigation on the design and off-design performance of supercritical carbon dioxide power system is conducted for the small-scale lead-cooled fast reactor in this paper. A suitable design operating condition is determined based on the system thermodynamic model and exergoeconomic model in the design stage. The off-design condition models of turbine, compressor and heat exchangers are established. Five kinds of off-design control strategies and their relationship with cleaner production and sustainable development are studied under different grid loads conditions. Results show that the system thermal efficiency can reach upto 32.18% with the optimal total product unit cost of 21.33$.GJ(-1) in the design stage. A designed centrifugal compressor based on the demonstrated Two-zone model displays good aerodynamic performance and a wide off-design operating range. The off-design performance analysis exhibits that all control strategies can complete the adjustment of power output over a range of 10%-100%. Inventory control is the best control strategy. Cleaner production coefficient decreases with the grid load for all control strategies, and this research can provide references for cleaner production and promote the sustainable development of society effectively. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据