4.7 Article

Response surface parallel optimization of extraction of total phenolics from separate white and red grape skin mixtures with microwave-assisted and conventional thermal methods

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 251, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119563

关键词

RS optimization; Grape skins; Pomace; Microwave-assisted extraction; Conventional thermal extraction; Industrial microwave reactor

资金

  1. Australia's grape growers and winemakers federation through Wine Australia Research and Development
  2. School of Agriculture, Food and Wine of the University of Adelaide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) was compared with conventional thermal extraction (CTE) to find optimal conditions to maximize total phenolic (TP) content and colour CIELAB C*, separately from white and red skin mixtures of six common grape cultivars each. Five factors were modelled in preliminary and advanced screenings and response surface (RS) optimization followed by the model validation. Optimized and practically acceptable levels of the factors were identified. For white skin those levels were: 60% ethanol content, 6.6 mL/g grape skins liquid to solid ratio, 70 degrees C temperature, pH 1.5, time of extraction 4 min and 60 min for MAE and CTE, respectively. Correspondingly, for red skin mixtures 70% ethanol content, 6.6 mL/g grape skins liquid to solid ratio, 60 degrees C temperature, pH 1.5, time of extraction 4 min and 60 min for MAE and CTE. The model validation experiment confirmed the reproducibility of extraction at the levels identified. Efficiency of TP extraction was comparable between MAE and CTE for both white and red skins. The colour difference between MAE and CTE was noticeable for white skins only. This research presents a novel comparison of two rival industrial methods in application to phenolics extraction from grape skins, when both methods are optimized to extract maximum TP from the same biological material and with the same solvent. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据