4.7 Article

Life-cycle assessment of animal feed ingredients: Poultry fat, poultry by-product meal and hydrolyzed feather meal

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 252, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119845

关键词

Animal feed; Feedstuffs; Aquaculture; Life cycle assessment (LCA); Circular economy

资金

  1. Project ANIMAL4AQUA - Portugal (2020)
  2. European Regional Development Fund (FEDER) through the Operational Competitiveness Program (COMPETE) [017610]
  3. CIIMAR [UID/Multi/04423/2019]
  4. FCT [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016765, POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016764, CENTRO-01-0145-FEDER-030570]
  5. FEDER [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016765, POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016764, CENTRO-01-0145-FEDER-030570]
  6. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal [PDE/BDE/113668/2015]
  7. Soja de Portugal [PDE/BDE/113668/2015]
  8. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PDE/BDE/113668/2015] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents an environmental life cycle assessment of poultry fat (PF), poultry by-product meal (PBM) and steam hydrolyzed feather meal (HF). These ingredients are obtained by rendering poultry byproducts and can be used as valuable feedstuffs for the fish feed industry, displacing traditional fishmeal and fish oil, promoting a circular economy system by reducing waste, adding value to by-products of the poultry production and reintroducing them in the economy as high-value products. A life cycle inventory and model were implemented for the PF, PBM and HF production chains based on data collected from two poultry by-product rendering units: the first producing both PF and PBM, and the second producing only HF. Four environmental impact categories were assessed using the CML life-cycle impact assessment method: global warming (GW), abiotic depletion (AD), acidification (AC) and eutrophication (EUT). The impacts calculated with economic allocation for 1 t of PF, 1 t of PBM and 1 t of HF from poultry byproducts are 666, 726 and 597 kg CO2 eq (GW); 3.8, 4.2 and 3.2 kg Sb eq (AD); 4.2, 4.6 and 4.7 kg SO2 eq (AC); and 1.8, 2.0 and 2.1 kg PO(4)(3-)eq (EUT), respectively. The rendering process of by-products is mainly responsible for GW and AD (mainly due to process heat), while the poultry production is the main contributor for AC and EUT. In more detail, a sensitivity analysis of alternative multifunctionality procedures for dealing with poultry by-products was performed, showing that the selected allocation method has a huge influence on the life cycle impacts, with higher impacts when mass allocation is employed instead of economic allocation. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis was conducted on the type of energy used in the rendering process, and distances in poultry by-product transportation to the rendering plants. The results show that the fuel source for process heat or the electricity generation system has a significant influence on the impacts, while the transportation distance has much less. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据