4.7 Article

Resilience assessment of the lithium supply chain in China under impact of new energy vehicles and supply interruption

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 252, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119624

关键词

Lithium; New energy vehicles; Supply interruption risk; Supply-chain resilience; System dynamics

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71974208, 71633006, 71874210]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017T100124]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan [2018JJ2539]
  4. Think-tank Foundation of Hunan Social Science Committee [18ZWB20]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of new energy vehicles had a huge impact on lithium demand under the framework of the lithium supply chain, and geopolitical changes have increased the risk of lithium supply interruption. Does the lithium supply chain have the coping ability under the demand impact of new energy vehicles and the risk of supply interruption? Can some improvement measures improve the coping ability of the lithium supply chain? In this paper, the system dynamic modeling is used method to evaluate the supply-chain resilience; make the price, supply and demand systems be the three resilient mechanisms of the lithium supply chain; and set demand impact, supply interrupt, and three enhancement measures as the model scenes. The simulation results show that the lithium supply chain is less resilient under the impact of new energy vehicles. Furthermore, the resilience of the lithium supply chain is good under the risk of short-term supply interruption, but worse under long-term supply interruption. Finally, promoting a design for recycling has the most obvious improvement in coping ability with the lithium supply chain, with reserve stockpile and drawdown focused more on adjusting supply chain fluctuations and; material substitution has only a slight improvement in supply-chain resilience. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据