4.7 Article

Cradle to grave Life Cycle Assessment of Lebanese biomass briquettes

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 253, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119851

关键词

Life Cycle Assessment; Biomass; Biomass briquettes; Lebanon; Diesel; Sustainability

资金

  1. European Union [ENPI/2014/354 - 063]
  2. Koura Municipalities Union
  3. El Koura Development Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The bioenergy sector is showing a recent development in Lebanon, a Mediterranean country, where the valorization of forestry and agricultural waste through briquetting consists one of the mostly applied and targeted applications. This study aims at analyzing the life cycle environmental impacts of biomass briquettes produced from olive pruning residues and used for heating purposes in traditional Lebanese stoves. The biomass briquettes are mainly introduced as a replacement for the light fossil fuels widespread used in similar stoves for the same purpose. Consequently, this paper also extends the literature-found comparison of the consumption phases between biomass briquettes and light fossil fuels to a comparative gate-to-gate LCA of these products. For the briquette itself, the results indicate that the consumption life cycle stage is the one that contributes to the most to all damage categories. Its contribution is 61%, 94%, 80% and 79% of the total contribution to Human Health, Ecosystem quality, Climate change, and Resources damage categories respectively. When compared to light fossil fuels, biomass briquettes present overall better environmental results with exceptions for Non-carcinogens (6.28E-04 kg C2H3Cleq), Aquatic ecotoxicity (1.01E-02 kg TEG water), Terrestrial ecotoxicity (5.04E-02 kg TEG soil), and Land occupation (9.37E-03 m(2)org.able) impact categories. This overall outcome is mainly linked to the fact that biomass briquettes are used as a replacement to traditionally adopted energy sources while reducing burning activities in the field. Moreover, sensitivity and uncertainty analyses are also conducted to verify the robustness of the results. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据