4.7 Article

Time-dependent optimized coupled-cluster method for multielectron dynamics. II. A coupled electron-pair approximation

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 152, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.5143747

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan [17K05070, 18H03891, 19H00869]
  2. JST COI [JPMJCE1313]
  3. JST CREST
  4. MEXT Quantum Leap Flagship Program (MEXT Q-LEAP) [JPMJCR15N1]
  5. [JPMXS0118067246]
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19H00869, 18H03891, 17K05070] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the implementation of a cost-effective approximation method within the framework of the time-dependent optimized coupled-cluster (TD-OCC) method [T. Sato et al., J. Chem. Phys. 148, 051101 (2018)] for real-time simulations of intense laser-driven multielectron dynamics. The method, designated as TD-OCEPA0, is a time-dependent extension of the simplest version of the coupled-electron pair approximation with optimized orbitals [U. Bozkaya and C. D. Sherrill, J. Chem. Phys. 139, 054104 (2013)]. It is size extensive, gauge invariant, and computationally much more efficient than the TD-OCC method with double excitations. We employed this method to simulate the electron dynamics in Ne and Ar atoms exposed to intense near infrared laser pulses with various intensities. The computed results, including high-harmonic generation spectra and ionization yields, are compared with those of various other methods ranging from uncorrelated time-dependent Hartree-Fock to fully correlated (within the active orbital space) time-dependent complete-active-space self-consistent field (TD-CASSCF). The TD-OCEPA0 results show good agreement with TD-CASSCF ones for moderate laser intensities. For higher intensities, however, TD-OCEPA0 tends to overestimate the correlation effect, as occasionally observed for CEPA0 in the ground-state correlation energy calculations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据