4.7 Article

Could Egg White Lysozyme be Solved by Single Particle Cryo-EM?

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING
卷 60, 期 5, 页码 2605-2613

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b01176

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme [766970 Q-SORT]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The combination of high-end cryogenic transmission electron microscopes (cryo-EM), direct electron detectors, and advanced image algorithms allows researchers to obtain the 3D structures of much smaller macromolecules than years ago. However, there are still major challenges for the single-particle cryo-EM method to achieve routine structure determinations for macromolecules much smaller than 100 kDa, which are the majority of all plant and animal proteins. These challenges include sample characteristics such as sample heterogeneity, beam damage, ice layer thickness, stability, and quality, as well as hardware limitations such as detector performance, beam, and phase plate quality. Here, single particle data sets were simulated for samples that were ideal in terms of homogeneity, distribution, and stability, but with realistic parameters for ice layer, dose, detector performance, and beam characteristics. Reference data were calculated for human apo-ferritin using identical parameters reported for an experimental data set downloaded from EMPIAR. Processing of the simulated data set resulted in a value of 1.86 angstrom from 20 214 particles, similar to a 2 angstrom density map obtained from 29 224 particles selected from real micrographs. Simulated data sets were then generated for a 14 kDa protein, hen egg white lysozyme (HEWL), with and without an ideal phase plate (PP). Whereas we could not obtain a high-resolution 3D reconstruction of HEWL for the data set without PP, the one with PP resulted in a 2.78 angstrom resolution density map from 225 751 particles. Our simulator and simulations could help in pushing the size limits of cryo-EM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据