4.6 Article

Hypoxia drives the assembly of the multienzyme purinosome complex

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 295, 期 28, 页码 9551-9566

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.012175

关键词

purinosome; hypoxia; hypoxia-inducible factor 1; HIF-1; metabolon; de novopurine biosynthesis; 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase; IMP cyclohydrolase (ATIC); cellular metabolism; purine; hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF); cell metabolism; metabolism

资金

  1. Hilary Marsden Institute for Life Sciences Scholarship
  2. Cancer Research UK [A20185]
  3. National Institutes of Health [GM024129]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purinosome is a dynamic metabolic complex composed of enzymes responsible forde novopurine biosynthesis, whose formation has been associated with elevated purine demand. However, the physiological conditions that govern purinosome formation in cells remain unknown. Here, we report that purinosome formation is up-regulated in cells in response to a low-oxygen microenvironment (hypoxia). We demonstrate that increased purinosome assembly in hypoxic human cells requires the activation of hypoxia inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) and not HIF-2. Hypoxia-driven purinosome assembly was inhibited in cells lacking 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase/IMP cyclohydrolase (ATIC), a single enzyme inde novopurine biosynthesis, and in cells treated with a small molecule inhibitor of ATIC homodimerization. However, despite the increase in purinosome assembly in hypoxia, we observed no associated increase inde novopurine biosynthesis in cells. Our results indicate that this was likely due to a reduction in mitochondrial one-carbon metabolism, resulting in reduced mitochondrion-derived one-carbon units needed forde novopurine biosynthesis. The findings of our study further clarify and deepen our understanding of purinosome formation by revealing that this process does not solely depend on cellular purine demand.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据