4.6 Article

Mechanism of allosteric inhibition in thePlasmodium falciparumcGMP-dependent protein kinase

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 295, 期 25, 页码 8480-8491

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.RA120.013070

关键词

cyclic GMP (cGMP); malaria; nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR); signaling; plasmodium; protein kinase G (PKG); 8-NBD-cGMP; CNB; cyclic nucleotide?binding domain (CBD); kinase signaling; PfPKG

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research Grant [389522]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [RGPIN-2019-05990]
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [He1818/10]
  4. funding line Future PhosMOrg of the University of Kassel
  5. Graduate School Clocks of the University of Kassel

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most malaria deaths are caused by the protozoan parasitePlasmodium falciparum. Its life cycle is regulated by a cGMP-dependent protein kinase (PfPKG), whose inhibition is a promising antimalaria strategy. Allosteric kinase inhibitors, such as cGMP analogs, offer enhanced selectivity relative to competitive kinase inhibitors. However, the mechanisms underlying allostericPfPKG inhibition are incompletely understood. Here, we show that 8-NBD-cGMP is an effectivePfPKG antagonist. Using comparative NMR analyses of a key regulatory domain,PfD, in itsapo, cGMP-bound, and cGMP analog?bound states, we elucidated its inhibition mechanism of action. Using NMR chemical shift analyses, molecular dynamics simulations, and site-directed mutagenesis, we show that 8-NBD-cGMP inhibitsPfPKG not simply by reverting a two-state activeversusinactive equilibrium, but by sampling also a distinct inactive ?mixed? intermediate. Surface plasmon resonance indicates that the ability to stabilize a mixed intermediate provides a means to effectively inhibitPfPKG, without losing affinity for the cGMP analog. Our proposed model may facilitate the rational design ofPfPKG-selective inhibitors for improved management of malaria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据