4.4 Article

Twenty-one year experience with intrauterine inseminations after controlled ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins: maternal age is the only prognostic factor for success

期刊

JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS
卷 37, 期 5, 页码 1195-1201

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01752-3

关键词

Intrauterine Insemination; Infertility; Maternal Age; Ovarian Reserve

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose To report our experience on homologous intrauterine insemination (IUI) with gonadotropin controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) cycles and to examine different variables which could predict IUI success. Materials and methods This is a retrospective analysis of IUIs performed between January 1997 and December 2017. A total of 7359 COS IUI's procedures (2901 couples) were reviewed. Clinical pregnancy, live birth rate and age, body mass index (BMI), smoking habit, duration of infertility, sperm characteristics before and after treatment (total motile count, morphology, and vitality), day 3 FSH, total gonadotropin dose, and number of follicles were assessed by multivariate logistic regression analysis, and data were expressed as odds ratio (OR). Results The mean female age at the time of COS was 35.10 +/- 3.93 years. The most common single infertility diagnoses were unexplained infertility (53.55%), mild male factor (19.69%), and anovulation (10.95%). The total progressive motile sperm count (TPMC) was > 1 x 10(6)/ml (mean 1.34 +/- 1.08 x 10(6)/ml). The clinical pregnancy rate was 9.38%, and the live birth rate was 7.19% per cycle. Twin pregnancies were 12.17%. Cumulative pregnancy was 21.89% and cumulative live birth rate was 17.58% per couple. Clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were significantly associated with female age [OR 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-0.99) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.93-0.97), respectively] and day 3 FSH [OR 0.91 (95% CI 0.87-0.94) e 0.90 (95% CI 0.87-0.94), respectively]. Conclusions Clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rates after COS-IUIs were significantly influenced by female age and FSH levels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据