4.5 Article

Soil prokaryotic community structure is determined by a plant-induced soil salinity gradient rather than other environmental parameters associated with plant presence in a saline grassland

期刊

JOURNAL OF ARID ENVIRONMENTS
卷 176, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2020.104100

关键词

Diversity; Drylands; Nitrogen mineralization; Prokaryotic community; Saline soil; Tamarisk

资金

  1. JSPS-KAKENHI [15H05113]
  2. JSPS-NSFC Bilateral Joint Research Projects (NSFC) [41411140035, 41171419]
  3. JSPS [17J07686, 12J04309]
  4. Fund of Joint Research Program of Arid Land Research Center, Tottori University
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17J07686, 15H05113] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soil microbial communities, which play important roles in biogeochemical cycling, are affected by plants in many ways. To understand how plants affect soil microbes, we compared soils under halophytic shrubs and herbs, whose effects on soil salinity (one of the strongest determining factors for soil microbes in saline grasslands) were different. We measured soil physicochemical properties, as well as prokaryotic abundance, community structure, diversity, and the quantified and predicted abundances of functional genes for nitrogen (N) cycling. As we intended, we found the soil salinity to be the highest in barren areas (BA), intermediate under a tamarisk crown (UC), and the lowest in herbaceous patches (HP), whereas other plant-related properties, e.g. soil organic matter content, differed between vegetated areas (UC and HP) and BA. Prokaryotic community structure and diversity changed along the soil salinity gradient, but not as a function of plant presence or absence. However, N transformation rate and N availability were not affected by the salinity gradient alone. The dominant prokaryotic groups that contributed the most to changes in prokaryotic community structure and diversity were likely not those primarily responsible for N mineralization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据