4.7 Article

Selection of indicators for assessing and managing the impacts of bottom trawling on seabed habitats

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY
卷 57, 期 7, 页码 1199-1209

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.13617

关键词

beam trawl; ecosystem approach to fisheries management; hydraulic dredge; meta-analysis; otter trawl; scallop dredge; systematic review

资金

  1. David and Lucile Packard Foundation
  2. Walton Family Foundation
  3. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations
  4. Alaska Seafood Cooperative
  5. American Seafoods Group
  6. Blumar Seafoods
  7. Clearwater Seafoods
  8. Espersen Group
  9. Glacier Fish Company LLC
  10. Gorton's Inc.
  11. Independent Fisheries Limited
  12. Nippon Suisan (USA), Inc.
  13. Pacific Andes International Holdings, Ltd.
  14. Pesca Chile S. A.
  15. San Arawa, S. A.
  16. Sanford Ltd. N.Z.
  17. Sealord Group Ltd. N. Z.
  18. South African Trawling Association
  19. Trident Seafoods
  20. FP7 [312088]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bottom trawl fisheries are the most widespread source of anthropogenic physical disturbance to seabed habitats. Development of fisheries-, conservation- and ecosystem-based management strategies requires the selection of indicators of the impact of bottom trawling on the state of benthic biota. Many indicators have been proposed, but no rigorous test of a range of candidate indicators against nine commonly agreed criteria (concreteness, theoretical basis, public awareness, cost, measurement, historical data, sensitivity, responsiveness, specificity) has been performed. Here, we collated data from 41 studies that compared the benthic biota in trawled areas with those in control locations (that were either not trawled or trawled infrequently), examining seven potential indicators (numbers and biomass for individual taxa and whole communities, evenness, Shannon-Wiener diversity and species richness) to assess their performance against the set of nine criteria. The effects of trawling were stronger on whole-community numbers and biomass than for individual taxa. Species richness was also negatively affected by trawling but other measures of diversity were not. Community numbers and biomass met all criteria, taxa numbers and biomass and species richness satisfied most criteria, but evenness and Shannon-Wiener diversity did not respond to trawling and only met few criteria, and hence are not suitable state indicators of the effect of bottom trawling. Synthesis and applications. An evaluation of each candidate indicator against a commonly agreed suite of desirable properties coupled with the outputs of our meta-analysis showed that whole-community numbers of individuals and biomass are the most suitable indicators of bottom trawling impacts as they performed well on all criteria. Strengths of these indicators are that they respond strongly to trawling, relate directly to ecosystem functioning and are straightforward to measure. Evenness and Shannon-Wiener diversity are not responsive to trawling and unsuitable for the monitoring and assessment of bottom trawl impacts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据