4.7 Article

Mechanistic Differences in the Inhibition of NF-κB by Turmeric and Its Curcuminoid Constituents

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 68, 期 22, 页码 6154-6160

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c02607

关键词

turmeric; curcumin; anti-inflammatory; polyphenol; degradation

资金

  1. National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)
  2. Office of Dietary Supplements (ODS)
  3. National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01AT006896, R01CA174926, R34AT007837, F31AT009938]
  4. NIH [P30DK058404]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Turmeric extract, a mixture of curcumin and its demethoxy (DMC) and bisdemethoxy (BDMC) isomers, is used as an anti-inflammatory preparation in traditional Asian medicine. Curcumin is considered to be the major bioactive compound in turmeric but less is known about the relative anti-inflammatory potency and mechanism of the other components, their mixture, or the reduced in vivo metabolites. We quantified inhibition of the NF-kappa B pathway in cells, adduction to a peptide mimicking I kappa B kinase beta, and the role of cellular glutathione as a scavenger of electrophilic curcuminoid oxidation products, suggested to be the active metabolites. Turmeric extracts (IC50 14.5 +/- 2.9 mu M), DMC (IC50 12.1 +/- 7.2 mu M), and BDMC (IC50 8.3 +/- 1.6 mu M), but not reduced curcumin, inhibited NF-kappa B similar to curcumin (IC50 18.2 +/- 3.9 mu M). Peptide adduction was formed with turmeric and DMC but not with BDMC, and this correlated with their oxidative degradation. Inhibition of glutathione biosynthesis enhanced the activity of DMC but not BDMC in the cellular assay. These findings suggest that NF-kappa B inhibition by curcumin and DMC involves their oxidation to reactive electrophiles, whereas BDMC does not require oxidation. Because it has not been established whether curcumin undergoes oxidative transformation in vivo, oxidation-independent BDMC may be a promising alternative to test in clinical trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据