4.7 Article

Emotion reactivity, nonsuicidal self-injury, and regulatory emotional self-efficacy: A moderated mediation model of suicide ideation

期刊

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
卷 266, 期 -, 页码 82-89

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.083

关键词

Suicide ideation; Emotion reactivity; Nonsuicidal self-injury; Regulatory emotional self-efficacy; Moderated mediation; Adolescents

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31771228]
  2. Project of Key Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, MOE [17JJD190001, 16JJD190001]
  3. Guangdong Youth Research Project [2018WT005]
  4. Foundation for Humanities and Social Sciences of Ministry of Education in China [18JDSZ1014]
  5. Hunan Province Education Sciences Planning Project [XJK17CZXX046]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Adolescent suicide ideation (SI) has received increased attention in recent years, and emotion reactivity (ER) has been found to be a risk factor for SI. However, little is known about the mediating and moderating mechanisms underlying this relationship. The aim of this study is to test a moderated mediation model of SI. Method: A total of 2,716 Chinese adolescents (53.2% males, mean age = 13.19 years, SD = 0.52) completed self-report questionnaires regarding SI, ER, nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI), and regulatory emotional self-efficacy (RESE). Results: After controlling for gender, ER was significantly associated with SI, and this association was mediated by NSSI. RESE buffered the relation between ER and SI, as well as the relation between ER and NSSI. Limitation: This study was cross-sectional in design and relied upon self-report measures only. Almost all participants were recruited from a single city of China. Conclusion: Findings of this study demonstrate a relationship among ER, NSSI, and SI, and expand our understanding of the development of SI. Further, RESE may be a protective factor against SI and NSSI in adolescence, which suggests a potential role of promoting RESE in the prevention and intervention of SI and NSSI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据