4.7 Article

Antidepressants and suicidality: A re-analysis of the re-analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
卷 266, 期 -, 页码 95-99

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.107

关键词

Antidepressants; Suicide; Suicide attempts; Suicide risk; Meta-analysis

资金

  1. Charite Clinician-Scientist Program of the Berlin Institute of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: A recent study by Hengartner and Ploderl describes a strong increase for suicides (odds ratio (OR) of 2.83, 95% CI =1.13-9.67) and suicide attempts (OR = 2.38 95%, CI =1.63-3.61) in antidepressant treated patients as compared to placebo. The authors re-analyzed data presented by Khan et al. who found no drugplacebo differences in suicide and suicide attempt rates. Hengartner and Ploderl base their findings on calculating the OR from a 2 x 2 table of the sum of the events and the totals of the sample sizes across studies. We here argue that pooling data from all drugs may not be the adequate approach. Methods: We applied a meta-analytical approach to account for between-drug variance and conducted several statistical analyses as a sensitivity analysis. We argue that a more suitable approach for finding an overall effect from several observations is a meta-analytical approach namely the Mantel-Haenszel method without continuity correction. Results: Our analysis leads to different conclusions as opposed to Hengartner and Ploderl. With the recommended method we estimate an OR of 1.98, 95% CI 0.71-5.50 for suicides and 1.63 (95%CI = 1.09-2.43) for suicide attempts. Limitations: The conducted analysis was restricted to the data available from the previous studies. Possibly, a more extensive search of the literature would lead to different results. However, we showed that re-analysing the re-analysis with several different approaches underlines the necessity of sensitivity analysis. Conclusion: We could show that, in the case of rare events, the data is very sensitive to different analytical approaches underlining the importance of further investigations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据