4.8 Article

Global distribution of a chlorophyll f cyanobacterial marker

期刊

ISME JOURNAL
卷 14, 期 9, 页码 2275-2287

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41396-020-0670-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. IC Schrodinger Scholarship
  2. BBSRC [BB/L011506/1, BB/R001383/1]
  3. Leverhulme Project Grant [RPG-2017-233]
  4. Projekt DEAL
  5. Microbiology Societey (Hayes-Burnet Award)
  6. BBSRC [BB/R001383/1, BB/L011506/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Some cyanobacteria use light outside the visible spectrum for oxygenic photosynthesis. The far-red light (FRL) region is made accessible through a complex acclimation process that involves the formation of new phycobilisomes and photosystems containing chlorophyllf. Diverse cyanobacteria ranging from unicellular to branched-filamentous forms show this response. These organisms have been isolated from shaded environments such as microbial mats, soil, rock, and stromatolites. However, the full spread of chlorophyllf-containing species in nature is still unknown. Currently, discovering new chlorophyllfcyanobacteria involves lengthy incubation times under selective far-red light. We have used a marker gene to detect chlorophyllforganisms in environmental samples and metagenomic data. This marker,apcE2, encodes a phycobilisome linker associated with FRL-photosynthesis. By focusing on a far-red motif within the sequence, degenerate PCR and BLAST searches can effectively discriminate against the normal chlorophylla-associatedapcE. Even short recovered sequences carry enough information for phylogenetic placement. Markers of chlorophyllfphotosynthesis were found in metagenomic datasets from diverse environments around the globe, including cyanobacterial symbionts, hypersaline lakes, corals, and the Arctic/Antarctic regions. This additional information enabled higher phylogenetic resolution supporting the hypothesis that vertical descent, as opposed to horizontal gene transfer, is largely responsible for this phenotype's distribution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据