4.7 Review

The Utility of Liquid Biopsies in Radiation Oncology

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.05.008

关键词

-

资金

  1. Gattuso-Slaight Personalized Cancer Medicine Fund from the Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation
  2. Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Discovery Program
  3. Wharton Family
  4. Reed Fund
  5. Conquer Cancer Foundation of ASCO
  6. Cancer Research Society
  7. Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute
  8. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  9. International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer
  10. Joe's Team
  11. Ontario Molecular Pathology Research Network of the Ontario Institute for Cancer Research
  12. Lung Cancer Research Foundation
  13. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  14. Clinical and Translational Science Center at Weill Cornell Medical Center
  15. MSKCC [UL1TR00457]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of therapeutic radiation is primarily guided by clinicopathologic factors and medical imaging, whereas molecular biomarkers currently play a comparatively minor role in most settings. Liquid biopsies provide a rich source of noninvasive tumor-specific biomarkers and are amenable to repeated and noninvasive assessment. Here, we review the current status of liquid biopsies and their potential impact on the field of radiation oncology. We focus on established and emerging approaches to analyze circulating tumor DNA and circulating tumor cells from peripheral blood. These promising classes of biomarkers could have an outsized impact on cancer management by meaningfully stratifying patients into risk groups, tracking radiation therapy efficacy during and after treatment, and identifying patients with radiosensitive or radioresistant disease. Finally, we highlight opportunities for future investigation including the need for prospective interventional studies employing liquid biopsies to guide the management of radiation therapy-treated patients. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据