4.7 Article

Learning dispatching rules for single machine scheduling with dynamic arrivals based on decision trees and feature construction

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH
卷 59, 期 9, 页码 2838-2856

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2020.1741716

关键词

Scheduling; single-machine scheduling; decision tree; genetic programming; machine learning; feature construction; dispatching rules

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a decision-tree-based approach with genetic programming to learn dispatching rules from existing schedules and improve them to minimize delays. Experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms existing rules and provides understandable scheduling insights.
In this paper, we address the dynamic single-machine scheduling problem for minimisation of total weighted tardiness by learning of dispatching rules (DRs) from schedules. We propose a decision-tree-based approach called Generation of Rules Automatically with Feature construction and Tree-based learning (GRAFT) in order to extract dispatching rules from existing or good schedules. GRAFT consists of two phases: learning a DR from schedules, and improving the DR with feature-construction-based genetic programming. With respect to the process of learning DRs from schedules, we present an approach for transforming schedules into training data containing underlying scheduling decisions and generating a decision-tree-based DR. Thereafter, the second phase improves the learned DR by feature-construction-based genetic programming so as to minimise the average total weighted tardiness. We conducted experiments to verify the performance of the proposed approach, and the results showed that it outperforms the existing dispatching rules. Moreover, the proposed algorithm is effective in terms of extracting scheduling insights in such understandable formats as IF-THEN rules from existing schedules and improving DRs by grafting a new branch with a discovered attribute into a decision tree.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据