4.2 Article

5-Fluorouracil and Simvastatin Loaded Solid Lipid Nanoparticles for Effective Treatment of Colorectal Cancer Cells

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 16, 期 3, 页码 205-213

出版社

ASIAN NETWORK SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION-ANSINET
DOI: 10.3923/ijp.2020.205.213

关键词

5-FU; simvastatin; cytotoxicity; colorectal cancer; nanoparticle

资金

  1. King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology Research, Saudi Arabia [1-18-03-009-0055]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Objective: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most influential cause of cancer death worldwide. Despite its effectiveness in CRC therapy, its clinical applications are restricted because of its short half-life, resistance and severe side effects. The present study was directed to formulate nanoparticles of 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) in the presence of Simvastatin (SMV) in an attempt to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of 5-FU. Materials and Methods: Formulation of Solid Lipid Nanoparticles (SLN) has been performed and cytotoxic activity was tested in human colorectal cancer cell line (HCT-116) the IC50 was investigated to evaluate the cytotoxicity, apoptosis induction, cell cycle distribution and the intercellular Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) after treatment with SLN 5-FU and/or SMV compared with raw drug. Results:The particles size was 107-117 nM and stability of formula between -5.53 and -14 mV, Entrapment Efficiency was 80-97.5% for 5-FU and SMV, respectively. Raw 5-FU had IC50 12.69 mu M while cells treated with 5-FU SLN, IC50 dropped significantly and addition of 5 mu M SMV SLN, IC50 was significantly reduced. Also, treatment with SLN 5-FU alone and/or SMV significantly accumulated the cells in sub-G1 and dramatically increased the percentage of late apoptotic cells significantly in comparison to raw 5-FU. Moreover, SMV SLN with 5-FU had increased intracellular ROS accumulation. Conclusion:The SLN formulation for both 5-FU and SMV showed a significant cytotoxic potentiating effect against the growth of HCT-116 cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据