4.7 Article

Transcriptional Activity and Stability of CD39+CD103+CD8+T Cells in Human High-Grade Endometrial Cancer

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms21113770

关键词

tissue-resident memory cell; endometrial cancer; CD103; CD39; transcript stability; cytokinesis; IL-21

资金

  1. Dutch Cancer Society/Alpe d'Huzes [UMCG 2014-6719, RUG 2013-5960]
  2. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO-VENI grant) [916-16025]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells (TIL) are of the utmost importance in anti-tumor immunity. CD103 defines tumor-resident memory T cells (T-RM cells) associated with improved survival and response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) across human tumors. Co-expression of CD39 and CD103 marks tumor-specific T-RM with enhanced cytolytic potential, suggesting that CD39+CD103+ T-RM could be a suitable biomarker for immunotherapy. However, little is known about the transcriptional activity of T-RM cells in situ. We analyzed CD39+CD103+ T-RM cells sorted from human high-grade endometrial cancers (n = 3) using mRNA sequencing. Cells remained untreated or were incubated with PMA/ionomycin (activation), actinomycin D (a platinum-like chemotherapeutic that inhibits transcription), or a combination of the two. Resting CD39+CD103+ T-RM cells were transcriptionally active and expressed a characteristic T-RM signature. Activated CD39+CD103+ T-RM cells differentially expressed PLEK, TWNK, and FOS, and cytokine genes IFNG, TNF, IL2, CSF2 (GM-CSF), and IL21. Findings were confirmed using qPCR and cytokine production was validated by flow cytometry of cytotoxic TIL. We studied transcript stability and found that PMA-responsive genes and mitochondrial genes were particularly stable. In conclusion, CD39+CD103+ T-RM cells are transcriptionally active T-RM cells with a polyfunctional, reactivation-responsive repertoire. Secondly, we hypothesize that differential regulation of transcript stability potentiates rapid responses upon T-RM reactivation in tumors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据