4.7 Review

Colorectal Adenomas-Genetics and Searching for New Molecular Screening Biomarkers

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms21093260

关键词

colorectal adenoma; colorectal cancer; biomarkers; early detection

资金

  1. Grant Agency of the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic [AZVNV18-03-00199]
  2. Grant Agency of the Czech Republic [GACR18-09709S]
  3. Charles University Grant Agency [GAUK 302119]
  4. Charles University Research Centre program University Centre of Clinical and Experimental Liver Surgery [UNCE/MED/006]
  5. National Sustainability Program I (NPU I) [LO1503]
  6. COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) [CA17118]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a malignant disease with an incidence of over 1.8 million new cases per year worldwide. CRC outcome is closely related to the respective stage of CRC and is more favorable at less advanced stages. Detection of early colorectal adenomas is the key to survival. In spite of implemented screening programs showing efficiency in the detection of early precancerous lesions and CRC in asymptomatic patients, a significant number of patients are still diagnosed in advanced stages. Research on CRC accomplished during the last decade has improved our understanding of the etiology and development of colorectal adenomas and revealed weaknesses in the general approach to their detection and elimination. Recent studies seek to find a reliable non-invasive biomarker detectable even in the blood. New candidate biomarkers could be selected on the basis of so-called liquid biopsy, such as long non-coding RNA, microRNA, circulating cell-free DNA, circulating tumor cells, and inflammatory factors released from the adenoma into circulation. In this work, we focused on both genetic and epigenetic changes associated with the development of colorectal adenomas into colorectal carcinoma and we also discuss new possible biomarkers that are detectable even in adenomas prior to cancer development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据