4.7 Article

Environmental impact assessment of bio-hydrogenated diesel from hydrogen and co-product of palm oil industry

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 46, 期 17, 页码 10570-10585

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.03.183

关键词

Life cycle assessment; Bio-hydrogenated diesel; Palm fatty acid distillate; Fatty acid methyl ester; Greenhouse gas; Energy consumption

资金

  1. Thailand Research Fund [MSD57I0110]
  2. Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute (KURDI)
  3. Faculty of Engineering, Kasetsart University
  4. National Nanotechnology Center (NANOTEC) , NSTDA, Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation, Thailand, through its program of Research Network NANOTEC (RNN) , Center of Excellence on Petrochemical and Materials Technology (PETROMAT) ,

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared the environmental impacts of bio-hydrogenated diesel (BHD) produced from palm fatty acid distillate (PFAD) and fatty acid methyl ester (FAME). The results showed that energy consumption of BHD-PFAD was 1.18 times higher than that of BHD-FAME, while GHG emission was 13.56 times lower. The overall environmental impacts of BHD-PFAD were also 3.58 times greater than that of BHD-FAME.
Bio-hydrogenated diesel (BHD) is a second generation biofuel that can be produced from vegetable oil and hydrogen via hydroprocessing. BHD is considered as one of alternative and renewable energy. This work presents evaluation of environmental impacts of BHD produced from palm fatty acid distillate (PFAD) compared to fatty acid methyl ester (FAME). Greenhouse gas emission, energy consumption, and overall environmental impacts are assessed. System boundary is from palm oil cultivation to BHD production. The functional unit is defined as 1 kg of fuel produced at the plant. The results indicate that energy consumption of BHD-PFAD is 1.18 times higher than that of BHD-FAME, while giving GHG emission 13.56 times lower than that of BHD-FAME. The results of overall environmental impacts indicated that BHD-PFAD was 3.58 greater than that of BHD-FAME. (c) 2020 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据