4.7 Article

Data-driven fault diagnosis for PEMFC systems of hybrid tram based on deep learning

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 45, 期 24, 页码 13483-13495

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.03.035

关键词

Deep brief learning; Fault diagnosis; Hybrid tram; PEMFC systems; Synthetic minority over-sampling technique; Simulated annealing genetic algorithm fuzzy c-means clustering

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [51607149]
  2. Department of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province [2019YJ0236]
  3. Foundation of Key Laboratory of Magnetic Suspension Technology and Maglev Vehicle, Ministry of Education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The running state of the hybrid tram and the service life of fuel cell stacks are related to the fault diagnosis strategy of the proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) system. In order to accurately detect various fault types, a novel method is proposed to classify the different health states, which is composed of simulated annealing genetic algorithm fuzzy c-means clustering (SAGAFCM) and deep belief network (DBN) combined with synthetic minority over-sampling technique (SMOTE). Operation data generated by the tram are clustered by SAGAFCM algorithm, and valid data are selected as fault diagnosis samples which include the training sample and the test sample. However, the fault samples are usually unbalanced data. To reduce the influence of unbalanced data on the fault diagnosis accuracy, SMOTE is employed to form a new training sample by supplementing the data of the small sample. Then DBN is trained by the new training sample to obtain the fault diagnosis model. In this paper, the proposed method can well distinguish the four health states, which are high deionized water inlet temperature fault, hydrogen leakage fault, low air pressure fault and the normal state, with an accuracy of 99.97% for the training sample and 100% for the test sample. (C) 2020 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据