4.7 Article

Effect of hydrogen addition on conjugate heat transfer in a planar micro-combustor with the detailed reaction mechanism: An analytical approach

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 45, 期 30, 页码 15425-15440

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.03.236

关键词

Micro-combustor; Analytical solution; Reaction mechanism; Heat management; Hydrogen addition

资金

  1. Brain Pool Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science and ICT [NRF-2019H1D3A2A01102198]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2019H1D3A2A01102198] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a steady state analytical investigation of conjugate heat transfer in a planar micro-combustor is presented by considering the detailed reaction mechanisms for a methane/air mixture with 10% and 20% hydrogen addition. The primary objective is studying the effects of hydrogen addition on the wall and gas temperature distribution in order to propose a practical solution to manage the significant heat transfer in micro-combustors. The conservation equations are analytically solved in each zone using the matching conditions. Moreover, to present a general analysis, appropriate non-dimensional thermal parameters are recommended considering the thermal interaction between the reactive mixture, solid structure and ambient. As a result, appropriate correlations for the normalized wall temperature profile are presented for different situations that can be used as a prescribed wall temperature distribution in numerical simulations. Moreover, it is found that for the cases with solid-fluid thermal diffusion ratio greater than 50, the thermal properties can negate the effect of hydrogen addition on the wall temperature distribution. (C) 2020 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据