4.3 Article

Adsorption of ternary toxic crystal violet, malachite green and methylene blue onto synthesised SBA-15 mesoporous nanoparticles

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03067319.2020.1757085

关键词

SBA-15 silica nanoparticles; adsorption; cationic dyes; response surface methodology

资金

  1. Research Councils of Babol Noshirvani University of Technology and Semnan University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this research, SBA-15 mesoporous silica nanoparticles were synthesized and their adsorption performance for dyes was studied. The results show that SBA-15 nanoparticles have good adsorption capacity, and the adsorbent dosage is the most important factor affecting the adsorption.
In this research, SBA-15 mesoporous silica nanoparticles were synthesised and characterised using different techniques. Average particle size of synthesised SBA-15 was obtained to be 16 and 33.6 nm from field emission scanning electron microscopy image and X-ray diffraction analysis, respectively. Response surface methodology indicated that 70 mg L-1 initial dye concentrations, 0.1 g L-1 adsorbent dosage, 14 min contact time and pH 9, result in the best adsorption capacity of SBA-15 nanoparticles. According to analysis of variance, the most important factor on the adsorption of all dyes onto SBA-15 nanoparticles was adsorbent dosage. The equilibrium data were fitted by Langmuir isothermal model and adsorption kinetic data are more similar to the pseudo-first-order model. The thermodynamic analysis suggested that the adsorption of crystal violet (CV) and malachite green (MG) dyes on the SBA-15 nanoparticle is a spontaneous and endothermic process, meanwhile sorption of methylene blue (MB) dye was found exothermic. Also, the Delta G(0) value in the range of -0.27 to -7.1 kJ mol(-1) revealed that adsorption of three dyes on SBA-15 nanoparticles was physisorption. Finally, performance of the developed model was applied for the removal of these dyes in river water and simulated industrial wastewater.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据