4.3 Article

Deep eutectic solvent-based QuEChERS method combined with dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction for extraction of benzoylurea insecticides in cabbage leaves samples

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03067319.2020.1759568

关键词

Benzoylurea insecticides; dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction; QuEChERS; deep eutectic solvent; cabbage leaves

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a microwave-assisted quick-easy-cheap-effective-rugged-safe method based on deep eutectic solvent was combined with lighter than water organic solvent-based dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction for the extraction and preconcentration of benzoylurea insecticides from cabbage samples. The proposed method showed high enrichment factors, low limits of detection and quantification, good linearity, and satisfactory repeatability.
A microwave-assisted quick-easy-cheap-effective-rugged-safe method based on deep eutectic solvent was combined with lighter than water organic solvent-based-dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction for the extraction and preconcentration of some benzoylurea insecticides from cabbage samples. In this procedure, a portion of the crushed cabbage leaves are mixed with N,N-dimethyl ammonium chloride:ethylene glycol deep eutectic solvent and exposure to microwave radiations. Then, the mixture is centrifuged and the supernatant phase is removed and mixed with toluene. It is dispersed into the deionised water filled into a closed head (wide section) glass pipette. The obtained emulsion is broken using acetonitrile as a demulsifier. Under optimum conditions, the introduced method indicated high enrichment factors (260-425), low limits of detection (0.66-1.3 ng g(-1)) and quantification (2.2-4.4 ng g(-1)), good linearity (r(2) >= 0.9987) and satisfactory repeatability (relative standard deviation <= 7.1 at a concentration of 15 ng g(-1) of each analyte). Finally, the proposed method was utilised in the analysis of the analytes in cabbage leaves and hexaflumuron was determined in several samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据