4.7 Article

Effects of reciprocating liquid flow battery thermal management system on thermal characteristics and uniformity of large lithium-ion battery pack

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH
卷 44, 期 8, 页码 6383-6395

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/er.5363

关键词

lithium-ion battery; reciprocating liquid flow; second-order Thevenin circuit model; thermal characteristic; thermal uniformity

资金

  1. Program for the Development of Major Scientific Instruments and Equipment of the State [2012YQ150256]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To investigate the thermal characteristics and uniformity of a lithium-ion battery (LIB) pack, a second-order Thevenin circuit model of single LIB was modeled and validated experimentally. A battery thermal management system (BTMS) with reciprocating liquid flow was established based on the validated equivalent circuit model. The effects of the reciprocation period, battery module coolant flow rate and ambient temperature on the temperature and the temperature imbalance of batteries were studied. The results illustrate that the temperature difference can be effectively reduced by 3 degrees C when the reciprocating period is 590 seconds. The reciprocating coolant flow rate is 11.5% and 33.3% that of the unidirectional flow BTMS for cooling and heating when same thermal effects are to be achieved. Under the same ambient temperature condition, the maximum temperature and average temperature difference can be reduced by 1.67 degrees C and 3.77 degrees C, respectively, at best for the battery module investigated with a reciprocating liquid-flow cooling system. The average temperature difference and heating power consumption could be reduced by 1.2 degrees C and 14 kJ for reciprocating liquid flow heating system with period of 295 seconds when compared with unidirectional flow. As a result, the thermal characteristics and temperature uniformity can be effectively improved, and the parasitic power consumption can be significantly reduced through adoption of a reciprocating liquid flow BTMS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据