4.7 Article

Chitosan-loaded nanoemulsion containing Zataria Muitiflora Boiss and Bunium persicum Boiss essential oils as edible coatings: Its impact on microbial quality of turkey meat and fate of inoculated pathogens

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.02.092

关键词

Chitosan; Nanoemulsion; Microbial quality; Zataria Multiflora Boiss; Bunium persicum Boiss

资金

  1. Department of Food Hygiene and Aquaculture, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran [3/44718]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study was targeted to investigate the effect of chitosan-loaded nanoemulsion enriched with two types of essential oils on the microbial quality of turkey meat. To this end, the effects of essential oils of Zataria Mull flora Boiss (ZEO) and Bunium persicum Boiss (BEO) were evaluated at two concentrations (0.5% and 1% (w/v)) during 18 days of storage at 4 degrees C. Initially, in vitro evaluations were performed on the prepared nanoemulsions, namely essential oil nanoemulsions and chitosan-loaded nanoemulsions containing essential oils, using micro-dilution method and agar diffusion methods, respectively. Meat samples were analyzed for microbial indicators and inoculated salmonella Enteritidis, and Listeria monocytogenes during 3-day intervals. The highest reduction rate of total viable bacteria (2.06 log CFU/g), total psychrophilic (2.59 log CFU/g), Pseudomonas spp. (2.07 log CFU/g), Enterobacteriaceae (2.51 log CFU/g), lactic acid bacteria (2.51 log CFU/g), and yeast and mold count (2.10 log CFU/g) were observed in chitosan-loaded nanoemulsion containing ZEO 1%, in comparison with control samples. Moreover, the shelf life significantly increased due to the application of chi tosan-loaded nanoemulsions (15-18 days), compared to that of the control group (6 days). Therefore, the edible chitosan-based nanoemulsion could play an effective role in the preservation of the microbial qualities of turkey meat. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据